Oyehut vs Qui-nai-elt Village
A side-by-side comparison of Oyehut and Qui-nai-elt Village: population, income, housing, and more.
Oyehut and Qui-nai-elt Village are places in Washington. This page compares them across population, income, housing, education, commuting, and how each has changed since 2019.
Qui-nai-elt Village has the higher population (83 vs 64 in Oyehut). Oyehut has the higher median home value ($159,700 vs $158,900 in Qui-nai-elt Village).
Population, income & housing
| Oyehut | Qui-nai-elt Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 64 | 83 |
| Median age | 41.8 yrs | 31.3 yrs |
| Median home value | $159,700 | $158,900 |
| Median gross rent | — | $525 |
| Housing units | 60 | 21 |
| Homeownership rate | 78.9% | 61.9% |
| Bachelor's degree or higher | 55.3% | 14.0% |
| Unemployment rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Trends (ACS 5-year, 2019–2023)
| Oyehut | Qui-nai-elt Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 0 → 64 (+0.0%) | 50 → 83 (+66.0%) |
| Median home value | — | $137,500 → $158,900 (+15.6%) |
Oyehut
064
Qui-nai-elt Village
5083
$137,500$158,900
Age & race/ethnicity
Age distribution (share)
| Oyehut | Qui-nai-elt Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Under 5 | 0.0% | 4.8% |
| 5 to 17 | 26.6% | 43.4% |
| 18 to 24 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 25 to 34 | 12.5% | 7.2% |
| 35 to 44 | 14.1% | 15.7% |
| 45 to 54 | 0.0% | 10.8% |
| 55 to 64 | 0.0% | 6.0% |
| 65 to 74 | 12.5% | 2.4% |
| 75 and over | 34.4% | 9.6% |
Race & ethnicity (share)
| Oyehut | Qui-nai-elt Village | |
|---|---|---|
| White (non-Hispanic) | 100.0% | 4.8% |
| Black or African American | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| American Indian & Alaska Native | 0.0% | 49.4% |
| Asian | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Native Hawaiian & Pacific Islander | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Some other race | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Two or more races | 0.0% | 32.5% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 0.0% | 13.3% |
Educational attainment (age 25+)
Share of adults 25+
| Oyehut | Qui-nai-elt Village | |
|---|---|---|
| No high school diploma | 0.0% | 4.7% |
| High school graduate | 8.5% | 41.9% |
| Some college or associate's | 36.2% | 39.5% |
| Bachelor's degree | 55.3% | 9.3% |
| Graduate or professional degree | 0.0% | 4.7% |
Commute to work
How workers get to work (share)
| Oyehut | Qui-nai-elt Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Drove alone | 100.0% | 44.0% |
| Carpooled | 0.0% | 44.0% |
| Public transit | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Walked | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Bicycle | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Worked from home | 0.0% | 12.0% |
| Other means | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Housing
Units in structure (share)
| Oyehut | Qui-nai-elt Village | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-unit, detached | 100.0% | 95.2% |
| 1-unit, attached | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2 to 4 units | 0.0% | 4.8% |
| 5 to 19 units | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 20 or more units | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Mobile home & other | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Poverty & households
| Oyehut | Qui-nai-elt Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 34.4% | 38.6% |
| Average household size | 1.68 | 3.95 |
| Mean commute (minutes) | — | 25 |
| Median year structure built | 1958 | 2003 |
Full profiles
2Related rankings
21- Largest by population — cities in Washington
- Most densely populated — cities in Washington
- Highest median household income — cities in Washington
- Highest median home value — cities in Washington
- Most affordable home values — cities in Washington
- Highest median gross rent — cities in Washington
- Cheapest median gross rent — cities in Washington
- Oldest by median age — cities in Washington
- Youngest by median age — cities in Washington
- Most college-educated — cities in Washington
- Highest poverty rate — cities in Washington
- Lowest poverty rate — cities in Washington
- Highest homeownership rate — cities in Washington
- Lowest homeownership rate — cities in Washington
- Longest commutes — cities in Washington
- Shortest commutes — cities in Washington
- Largest households — cities in Washington
- Newest housing — cities in Washington
- Oldest housing — cities in Washington
- Fastest-growing (2019–2023) — cities in Washington
- Fastest-shrinking (2019–2023) — cities in Washington