Crescent vs Fort Klamath
A side-by-side comparison of Crescent and Fort Klamath: population, income, housing, and more.
Crescent and Fort Klamath are places in Oregon. This page compares them across population, income, housing, education, commuting, and how each has changed since 2019.
Crescent has the higher population (344 vs 134 in Fort Klamath). Crescent has the higher median household income ($45,278 vs $2,499 in Fort Klamath). Fort Klamath has the higher median home value ($210,000 vs $174,300 in Crescent).
Population, income & housing
| Crescent | Fort Klamath | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 344 | 134 |
| Median age | 66.0 yrs | 66.1 yrs |
| Median household income | $45,278 | $2,499 |
| Median home value | $174,300 | $210,000 |
| Housing units | 212 | 129 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 93.2% |
| Bachelor's degree or higher | 30.2% | 26.9% |
| Unemployment rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Trends (ACS 5-year, 2019–2023)
| Crescent | Fort Klamath | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 358 → 344 (-3.9%) | 31 → 134 (+332.3%) |
| Median household income | — | $32,917 → $2,499 (-92.4%) |
| Median home value | $131,000 → $174,300 (+33.1%) | $125,000 → $210,000 (+68.0%) |
Crescent
358344
$131,000$174,300
Fort Klamath
31134
$32,917$2,499
$125,000$210,000
Age & race/ethnicity
Age distribution (share)
| Crescent | Fort Klamath | |
|---|---|---|
| Under 5 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 5 to 17 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 18 to 24 | 7.6% | 0.0% |
| 25 to 34 | 16.3% | 0.0% |
| 35 to 44 | 2.9% | 0.0% |
| 45 to 54 | 2.0% | 0.0% |
| 55 to 64 | 21.2% | 42.5% |
| 65 to 74 | 35.8% | 22.4% |
| 75 and over | 14.2% | 35.1% |
Race & ethnicity (share)
| Crescent | Fort Klamath | |
|---|---|---|
| White (non-Hispanic) | 98.5% | 96.3% |
| Black or African American | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| American Indian & Alaska Native | 1.5% | 0.0% |
| Asian | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Native Hawaiian & Pacific Islander | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Some other race | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Two or more races | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 0.0% | 3.7% |
Educational attainment (age 25+)
Share of adults 25+
| Crescent | Fort Klamath | |
|---|---|---|
| No high school diploma | 37.4% | 0.0% |
| High school graduate | 27.7% | 33.6% |
| Some college or associate's | 4.7% | 39.6% |
| Bachelor's degree | 19.2% | 16.4% |
| Graduate or professional degree | 11.0% | 10.4% |
Commute to work
How workers get to work (share)
| Crescent | Fort Klamath | |
|---|---|---|
| Drove alone | 69.9% | 100.0% |
| Carpooled | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Public transit | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Walked | 30.1% | 0.0% |
| Bicycle | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Worked from home | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Other means | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Housing
Units in structure (share)
| Crescent | Fort Klamath | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-unit, detached | 85.4% | 69.0% |
| 1-unit, attached | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2 to 4 units | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 5 to 19 units | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 20 or more units | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Mobile home & other | 14.6% | 31.0% |
Poverty & households
| Crescent | Fort Klamath | |
|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 5.8% | 41.0% |
| Average household size | 2.23 | 1.30 |
| Median year structure built | 1981 | 1954 |
Full profiles
2Related rankings
21- Largest by population — cities in Oregon
- Most densely populated — cities in Oregon
- Highest median household income — cities in Oregon
- Highest median home value — cities in Oregon
- Most affordable home values — cities in Oregon
- Highest median gross rent — cities in Oregon
- Cheapest median gross rent — cities in Oregon
- Oldest by median age — cities in Oregon
- Youngest by median age — cities in Oregon
- Most college-educated — cities in Oregon
- Highest poverty rate — cities in Oregon
- Lowest poverty rate — cities in Oregon
- Highest homeownership rate — cities in Oregon
- Lowest homeownership rate — cities in Oregon
- Longest commutes — cities in Oregon
- Shortest commutes — cities in Oregon
- Largest households — cities in Oregon
- Newest housing — cities in Oregon
- Oldest housing — cities in Oregon
- Fastest-growing (2019–2023) — cities in Oregon
- Fastest-shrinking (2019–2023) — cities in Oregon