Goodland vs Inger
A side-by-side comparison of Goodland and Inger: population, income, housing, and more.
Goodland and Inger are places in Minnesota. This page compares them across population, income, housing, education, commuting, and how each has changed since 2019.
Inger has the higher population (77 vs 9 in Goodland). Since 2019, Goodland's population has grown faster (-30.8% vs -60.1%).
Population, income & housing
| Goodland | Inger | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9 | 77 |
| Median age | 65.8 yrs | 29.4 yrs |
| Median household income | — | $24,625 |
| Housing units | 8 | 49 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 40.0% |
| Bachelor's degree or higher | 22.2% | 0.0% |
| Unemployment rate | 0.0% | 57.1% |
Trends (ACS 5-year, 2019–2023)
| Goodland | Inger | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13 → 9 (-30.8%) | 193 → 77 (-60.1%) |
| Median household income | $14,500 → $56,250 (+287.9%) | $46,458 → $24,625 (-47.0%) |
| Median gross rent | — | $850 → $629 (-26.0%) |
Goodland
139
$14,500$56,250
Inger
19377
$46,458$24,625
$850$629
Age & race/ethnicity
Age distribution (share)
| Goodland | Inger | |
|---|---|---|
| Under 5 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 5 to 17 | 0.0% | 24.7% |
| 18 to 24 | 0.0% | 18.2% |
| 25 to 34 | 0.0% | 18.2% |
| 35 to 44 | 0.0% | 13.0% |
| 45 to 54 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 55 to 64 | 22.2% | 14.3% |
| 65 to 74 | 77.8% | 6.5% |
| 75 and over | 0.0% | 5.2% |
Race & ethnicity (share)
| Goodland | Inger | |
|---|---|---|
| White (non-Hispanic) | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Black or African American | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| American Indian & Alaska Native | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| Asian | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Native Hawaiian & Pacific Islander | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Some other race | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Two or more races | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Educational attainment (age 25+)
Share of adults 25+
| Goodland | Inger | |
|---|---|---|
| No high school diploma | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| High school graduate | 44.4% | 75.0% |
| Some college or associate's | 33.3% | 25.0% |
| Bachelor's degree | 22.2% | 0.0% |
| Graduate or professional degree | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Commute to work
How workers get to work (share)
| Goodland | Inger | |
|---|---|---|
| Drove alone | 100.0% | 52.4% |
| Carpooled | 0.0% | 47.6% |
| Public transit | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Walked | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Bicycle | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Worked from home | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Other means | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Housing
Units in structure (share)
| Goodland | Inger | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-unit, detached | 100.0% | 36.7% |
| 1-unit, attached | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2 to 4 units | 0.0% | 8.2% |
| 5 to 19 units | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 20 or more units | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Mobile home & other | 0.0% | 55.1% |
Poverty & households
| Goodland | Inger | |
|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 75.3% |
| Average household size | 1.50 | 3.08 |
| Median year structure built | 1948 | 1980 |
Full profiles
2Related rankings
21- Largest by population — cities in Minnesota
- Most densely populated — cities in Minnesota
- Highest median household income — cities in Minnesota
- Highest median home value — cities in Minnesota
- Most affordable home values — cities in Minnesota
- Highest median gross rent — cities in Minnesota
- Cheapest median gross rent — cities in Minnesota
- Oldest by median age — cities in Minnesota
- Youngest by median age — cities in Minnesota
- Most college-educated — cities in Minnesota
- Highest poverty rate — cities in Minnesota
- Lowest poverty rate — cities in Minnesota
- Highest homeownership rate — cities in Minnesota
- Lowest homeownership rate — cities in Minnesota
- Longest commutes — cities in Minnesota
- Shortest commutes — cities in Minnesota
- Largest households — cities in Minnesota
- Newest housing — cities in Minnesota
- Oldest housing — cities in Minnesota
- Fastest-growing (2019–2023) — cities in Minnesota
- Fastest-shrinking (2019–2023) — cities in Minnesota