Daphnedale Park vs New Pine Creek
A side-by-side comparison of Daphnedale Park and New Pine Creek: population, income, housing, and more.
Daphnedale Park and New Pine Creek are places in California. This page compares them across population, income, housing, education, commuting, and how each has changed since 2019.
Daphnedale Park has the higher population (158 vs 101 in New Pine Creek). Since 2019, New Pine Creek's population has grown faster (+14.8% vs -24.4%).
Population, income & housing
| Daphnedale Park | New Pine Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 158 | 101 |
| Median age | 36.2 yrs | 30.7 yrs |
| Housing units | 40 | 84 |
| Homeownership rate | 42.5% | 100.0% |
| Bachelor's degree or higher | 37.4% | 0.0% |
| Unemployment rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Trends (ACS 5-year, 2019–2023)
| Daphnedale Park | New Pine Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 209 → 158 (-24.4%) | 88 → 101 (+14.8%) |
| Median home value | $156,700 → $212,500 (+35.6%) | $134,100 → $130,400 (-2.8%) |
Daphnedale Park
209158
$156,700$212,500
New Pine Creek
88101
$134,100$130,400
Age & race/ethnicity
Age distribution (share)
| Daphnedale Park | New Pine Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Under 5 | 6.3% | 10.9% |
| 5 to 17 | 36.1% | 32.7% |
| 18 to 24 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 25 to 34 | 5.1% | 16.8% |
| 35 to 44 | 19.6% | 39.6% |
| 45 to 54 | 5.7% | 0.0% |
| 55 to 64 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 65 to 74 | 27.2% | 0.0% |
| 75 and over | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Race & ethnicity (share)
| Daphnedale Park | New Pine Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| White (non-Hispanic) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Black or African American | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| American Indian & Alaska Native | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Asian | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Native Hawaiian & Pacific Islander | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Some other race | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Two or more races | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Educational attainment (age 25+)
Share of adults 25+
| Daphnedale Park | New Pine Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| No high school diploma | 47.3% | 52.6% |
| High school graduate | 0.0% | 47.4% |
| Some college or associate's | 15.4% | 0.0% |
| Bachelor's degree | 27.5% | 0.0% |
| Graduate or professional degree | 9.9% | 0.0% |
Commute to work
How workers get to work (share)
| Daphnedale Park | New Pine Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Drove alone | 20.6% | 100.0% |
| Carpooled | 79.4% | 0.0% |
| Public transit | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Walked | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Bicycle | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Worked from home | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Other means | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Housing
Units in structure (share)
| Daphnedale Park | New Pine Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-unit, detached | 80.0% | 61.9% |
| 1-unit, attached | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2 to 4 units | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 5 to 19 units | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 20 or more units | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Mobile home & other | 20.0% | 38.1% |
Poverty & households
| Daphnedale Park | New Pine Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 27.2% | 39.6% |
| Average household size | 3.95 | 5.61 |
| Median year structure built | 1969 | 2005 |
Full profiles
2Related rankings
21- Largest by population — cities in California
- Most densely populated — cities in California
- Highest median household income — cities in California
- Highest median home value — cities in California
- Most affordable home values — cities in California
- Highest median gross rent — cities in California
- Cheapest median gross rent — cities in California
- Oldest by median age — cities in California
- Youngest by median age — cities in California
- Most college-educated — cities in California
- Highest poverty rate — cities in California
- Lowest poverty rate — cities in California
- Highest homeownership rate — cities in California
- Lowest homeownership rate — cities in California
- Longest commutes — cities in California
- Shortest commutes — cities in California
- Largest households — cities in California
- Newest housing — cities in California
- Oldest housing — cities in California
- Fastest-growing (2019–2023) — cities in California
- Fastest-shrinking (2019–2023) — cities in California