Darwin vs Furnace Creek
A side-by-side comparison of Darwin and Furnace Creek: population, income, housing, and more.
Darwin and Furnace Creek are places in California. This page compares them across population, income, housing, education, commuting, and how each has changed since 2019.
Furnace Creek has the higher population (102 vs 74 in Darwin). Since 2019, Furnace Creek's population has grown faster (-5.6% vs -26.0%).
Population, income & housing
| Darwin | Furnace Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 74 | 102 |
| Median age | 63.6 yrs | 35.9 yrs |
| Median home value | — | $9,999 |
| Housing units | 44 | 114 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 24.3% |
| Bachelor's degree or higher | 8.1% | 32.3% |
| Unemployment rate | — | 3.4% |
Trends (ACS 5-year, 2019–2023)
| Darwin | Furnace Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 100 → 74 (-26.0%) | 108 → 102 (-5.6%) |
| Median household income | — | $24,716 → $41,583 (+68.2%) |
| Median home value | $32,800 → $40,600 (+23.8%) | $9,999 → $9,999 (+0.0%) |
| Median gross rent | — | $161 → $99 (-38.5%) |
Darwin
10074
$32,800$40,600
Furnace Creek
108102
$24,716$41,583
$9,999$9,999
$161$99
Age & race/ethnicity
Age distribution (share)
| Darwin | Furnace Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Under 5 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 5 to 17 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 18 to 24 | 0.0% | 2.9% |
| 25 to 34 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 35 to 44 | 0.0% | 53.9% |
| 45 to 54 | 0.0% | 11.8% |
| 55 to 64 | 63.5% | 19.6% |
| 65 to 74 | 36.5% | 4.9% |
| 75 and over | 0.0% | 6.9% |
Race & ethnicity (share)
| Darwin | Furnace Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| White (non-Hispanic) | 36.5% | 56.9% |
| Black or African American | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| American Indian & Alaska Native | 0.0% | 18.6% |
| Asian | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Native Hawaiian & Pacific Islander | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Some other race | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Two or more races | 63.5% | 2.0% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 0.0% | 22.5% |
Educational attainment (age 25+)
Share of adults 25+
| Darwin | Furnace Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| No high school diploma | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| High school graduate | 63.5% | 45.5% |
| Some college or associate's | 28.4% | 22.2% |
| Bachelor's degree | 8.1% | 32.3% |
| Graduate or professional degree | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Commute to work
How workers get to work (share)
| Darwin | Furnace Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Drove alone | — | 5.1% |
| Carpooled | — | 3.8% |
| Public transit | — | 0.0% |
| Walked | — | 91.0% |
| Bicycle | — | 0.0% |
| Worked from home | — | 0.0% |
| Other means | — | 0.0% |
Housing
Units in structure (share)
| Darwin | Furnace Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-unit, detached | 47.7% | 7.9% |
| 1-unit, attached | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2 to 4 units | 0.0% | 20.2% |
| 5 to 19 units | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 20 or more units | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Mobile home & other | 52.3% | 71.9% |
Poverty & households
| Darwin | Furnace Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 49.0% |
| Average household size | 2.55 | 1.38 |
| Median year structure built | 1970 | 1978 |
Full profiles
2Related rankings
21- Largest by population — cities in California
- Most densely populated — cities in California
- Highest median household income — cities in California
- Highest median home value — cities in California
- Most affordable home values — cities in California
- Highest median gross rent — cities in California
- Cheapest median gross rent — cities in California
- Oldest by median age — cities in California
- Youngest by median age — cities in California
- Most college-educated — cities in California
- Highest poverty rate — cities in California
- Lowest poverty rate — cities in California
- Highest homeownership rate — cities in California
- Lowest homeownership rate — cities in California
- Longest commutes — cities in California
- Shortest commutes — cities in California
- Largest households — cities in California
- Newest housing — cities in California
- Oldest housing — cities in California
- Fastest-growing (2019–2023) — cities in California
- Fastest-shrinking (2019–2023) — cities in California