US Census Data

Asherville vs Hunter

A side-by-side comparison of Asherville and Hunter: population, income, housing, and more.

Asherville and Hunter are places in Kansas. This page compares them across population, income, housing, education, commuting, and how each has changed since 2019.

Hunter has the higher population (65 vs 0 in Asherville).

Population, income & housing

AshervilleHunter
Population065
Median age29.9 yrs
Median household income$37,917
Median home value$27,700
Housing units066
Homeownership rate100.0%
Bachelor's degree or higher20.9%
Unemployment rate0.0%

Trends (ACS 5-year, 2019–2023)

AshervilleHunter
Population0 → 0 (+0.0%)53 → 65 (+22.6%)
Median household income$33,438 → $37,917 (+13.4%)
Median home value$17,100 → $27,700 (+62.0%)

Asherville

Population
00

Hunter

Population
5365
Median household income
$33,438$37,917
Median home value
$17,100$27,700

Age & race/ethnicity

Age distribution (share)

AshervilleHunter
Under 57.7%
5 to 1713.8%
18 to 2412.3%
25 to 3426.2%
35 to 4413.8%
45 to 540.0%
55 to 644.6%
65 to 7412.3%
75 and over9.2%

Race & ethnicity (share)

AshervilleHunter
White (non-Hispanic)89.2%
Black or African American0.0%
American Indian & Alaska Native0.0%
Asian0.0%
Native Hawaiian & Pacific Islander0.0%
Some other race0.0%
Two or more races10.8%
Hispanic or Latino0.0%

Educational attainment (age 25+)

Share of adults 25+

AshervilleHunter
No high school diploma0.0%
High school graduate44.2%
Some college or associate's34.9%
Bachelor's degree20.9%
Graduate or professional degree0.0%

Commute to work

How workers get to work (share)

AshervilleHunter
Drove alone79.2%
Carpooled16.7%
Public transit0.0%
Walked4.2%
Bicycle0.0%
Worked from home0.0%
Other means0.0%

Housing

Units in structure (share)

AshervilleHunter
1-unit, detached95.5%
1-unit, attached0.0%
2 to 4 units0.0%
5 to 19 units0.0%
20 or more units0.0%
Mobile home & other4.5%

Poverty & households

AshervilleHunter
Poverty rate24.6%
Average household size2.10
Median year structure built1945

Full profiles

2

Related rankings

21