Fort Greely vs Tanacross
A side-by-side comparison of Fort Greely and Tanacross: population, income, housing, and more.
Fort Greely and Tanacross are places in Alaska. This page compares them across population, income, housing, education, commuting, and how each has changed since 2019.
Tanacross has the higher population (173 vs 85 in Fort Greely). Since 2019, Tanacross's population has grown faster (+13.1% vs -41.0%).
Population, income & housing
| Fort Greely | Tanacross | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 85 | 173 |
| Median age | 25.0 yrs | 32.6 yrs |
| Median household income | $68,194 | — |
| Median gross rent | $2,215 | $525 |
| Housing units | 103 | 63 |
| Homeownership rate | 0.0% | 45.9% |
| Bachelor's degree or higher | 2.4% | 10.0% |
| Unemployment rate | 0.0% | 11.1% |
Trends (ACS 5-year, 2019–2023)
| Fort Greely | Tanacross | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 144 → 85 (-41.0%) | 153 → 173 (+13.1%) |
| Median household income | $50,000 → $68,194 (+36.4%) | $41,250 → $53,125 (+28.8%) |
| Median gross rent | $1,214 → $2,215 (+82.5%) | $775 → $525 (-32.3%) |
Fort Greely
14485
$50,000$68,194
$1,214$2,215
Tanacross
153173
$41,250$53,125
$775$525
Age & race/ethnicity
Age distribution (share)
| Fort Greely | Tanacross | |
|---|---|---|
| Under 5 | 0.0% | 7.5% |
| 5 to 17 | 0.0% | 20.8% |
| 18 to 24 | 50.6% | 19.7% |
| 25 to 34 | 25.9% | 6.9% |
| 35 to 44 | 0.0% | 17.3% |
| 45 to 54 | 11.8% | 8.1% |
| 55 to 64 | 11.8% | 11.6% |
| 65 to 74 | 0.0% | 6.4% |
| 75 and over | 0.0% | 1.7% |
Race & ethnicity (share)
| Fort Greely | Tanacross | |
|---|---|---|
| White (non-Hispanic) | 62.4% | 2.3% |
| Black or African American | 1.2% | 5.8% |
| American Indian & Alaska Native | 0.0% | 87.3% |
| Asian | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Native Hawaiian & Pacific Islander | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Some other race | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Two or more races | 0.0% | 4.6% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 36.5% | 0.0% |
Educational attainment (age 25+)
Share of adults 25+
| Fort Greely | Tanacross | |
|---|---|---|
| No high school diploma | 0.0% | 30.0% |
| High school graduate | 23.8% | 40.0% |
| Some college or associate's | 73.8% | 20.0% |
| Bachelor's degree | 2.4% | 10.0% |
| Graduate or professional degree | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Commute to work
How workers get to work (share)
| Fort Greely | Tanacross | |
|---|---|---|
| Drove alone | 87.1% | 65.0% |
| Carpooled | 12.9% | 10.0% |
| Public transit | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Walked | 0.0% | 17.5% |
| Bicycle | 0.0% | 7.5% |
| Worked from home | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Other means | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Housing
Units in structure (share)
| Fort Greely | Tanacross | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-unit, detached | 0.0% | 96.8% |
| 1-unit, attached | 38.8% | 0.0% |
| 2 to 4 units | 17.5% | 3.2% |
| 5 to 19 units | 43.7% | 0.0% |
| 20 or more units | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Mobile home & other | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Poverty & households
| Fort Greely | Tanacross | |
|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 30.1% |
| Average household size | 1.44 | 4.68 |
| Mean commute (minutes) | 7 | 10 |
| Median year structure built | 2002 | 1988 |
Full profiles
2Related rankings
21- Largest by population — cities in Alaska
- Most densely populated — cities in Alaska
- Highest median household income — cities in Alaska
- Highest median home value — cities in Alaska
- Most affordable home values — cities in Alaska
- Highest median gross rent — cities in Alaska
- Cheapest median gross rent — cities in Alaska
- Oldest by median age — cities in Alaska
- Youngest by median age — cities in Alaska
- Most college-educated — cities in Alaska
- Highest poverty rate — cities in Alaska
- Lowest poverty rate — cities in Alaska
- Highest homeownership rate — cities in Alaska
- Lowest homeownership rate — cities in Alaska
- Longest commutes — cities in Alaska
- Shortest commutes — cities in Alaska
- Largest households — cities in Alaska
- Newest housing — cities in Alaska
- Oldest housing — cities in Alaska
- Fastest-growing (2019–2023) — cities in Alaska
- Fastest-shrinking (2019–2023) — cities in Alaska