Nunam Iqua vs Pitkas Point
A side-by-side comparison of Nunam Iqua and Pitkas Point: population, income, housing, and more.
Nunam Iqua and Pitkas Point are places in Alaska. This page compares them across population, income, housing, education, commuting, and how each has changed since 2019.
Pitkas Point has the higher population (221 vs 0 in Nunam Iqua). Since 2019, Pitkas Point's population has grown faster (+42.6% vs -100.0%).
Population, income & housing
| Nunam Iqua | Pitkas Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 0 | 221 |
| Median age | — | 22.1 yrs |
| Median household income | — | $57,500 |
| Median home value | — | $120,800 |
| Housing units | 6 | 52 |
| Homeownership rate | — | 60.0% |
| Bachelor's degree or higher | — | 0.0% |
| Unemployment rate | — | 38.0% |
Trends (ACS 5-year, 2019–2023)
| Nunam Iqua | Pitkas Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 158 → 0 (-100.0%) | 155 → 221 (+42.6%) |
| Median household income | $31,250 → $38,214 (+22.3%) | $51,667 → $57,500 (+11.3%) |
| Median home value | $54,000 → $45,000 (-16.7%) | $92,800 → $120,800 (+30.2%) |
Nunam Iqua
1580
$31,250$38,214
$54,000$45,000
Pitkas Point
155221
$51,667$57,500
$92,800$120,800
Age & race/ethnicity
Age distribution (share)
| Nunam Iqua | Pitkas Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Under 5 | — | 7.7% |
| 5 to 17 | — | 38.9% |
| 18 to 24 | — | 9.5% |
| 25 to 34 | — | 14.0% |
| 35 to 44 | — | 11.8% |
| 45 to 54 | — | 5.4% |
| 55 to 64 | — | 4.1% |
| 65 to 74 | — | 7.7% |
| 75 and over | — | 0.9% |
Race & ethnicity (share)
| Nunam Iqua | Pitkas Point | |
|---|---|---|
| White (non-Hispanic) | — | 0.0% |
| Black or African American | — | 0.0% |
| American Indian & Alaska Native | — | 100.0% |
| Asian | — | 0.0% |
| Native Hawaiian & Pacific Islander | — | 0.0% |
| Some other race | — | 0.0% |
| Two or more races | — | 0.0% |
| Hispanic or Latino | — | 0.0% |
Educational attainment (age 25+)
Share of adults 25+
| Nunam Iqua | Pitkas Point | |
|---|---|---|
| No high school diploma | — | 18.6% |
| High school graduate | — | 74.2% |
| Some college or associate's | — | 7.2% |
| Bachelor's degree | — | 0.0% |
| Graduate or professional degree | — | 0.0% |
Commute to work
How workers get to work (share)
| Nunam Iqua | Pitkas Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Drove alone | — | 22.7% |
| Carpooled | — | 0.0% |
| Public transit | — | 0.0% |
| Walked | — | 40.9% |
| Bicycle | — | 0.0% |
| Worked from home | — | 0.0% |
| Other means | — | 36.4% |
Housing
Units in structure (share)
| Nunam Iqua | Pitkas Point | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-unit, detached | 100.0% | 92.3% |
| 1-unit, attached | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2 to 4 units | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 5 to 19 units | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 20 or more units | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Mobile home & other | 0.0% | 7.7% |
Poverty & households
| Nunam Iqua | Pitkas Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | — | 45.7% |
| Average household size | — | 4.42 |
| Mean commute (minutes) | — | 6 |
| Median year structure built | 1980 | 1983 |
Full profiles
2Related rankings
21- Largest by population — cities in Alaska
- Most densely populated — cities in Alaska
- Highest median household income — cities in Alaska
- Highest median home value — cities in Alaska
- Most affordable home values — cities in Alaska
- Highest median gross rent — cities in Alaska
- Cheapest median gross rent — cities in Alaska
- Oldest by median age — cities in Alaska
- Youngest by median age — cities in Alaska
- Most college-educated — cities in Alaska
- Highest poverty rate — cities in Alaska
- Lowest poverty rate — cities in Alaska
- Highest homeownership rate — cities in Alaska
- Lowest homeownership rate — cities in Alaska
- Longest commutes — cities in Alaska
- Shortest commutes — cities in Alaska
- Largest households — cities in Alaska
- Newest housing — cities in Alaska
- Oldest housing — cities in Alaska
- Fastest-growing (2019–2023) — cities in Alaska
- Fastest-shrinking (2019–2023) — cities in Alaska