Mulberry vs Oswego
A side-by-side comparison of Mulberry and Oswego: population, income, housing, and more.
Mulberry and Oswego are places in South Carolina. This page compares them across population, income, housing, education, commuting, and how each has changed since 2019.
Mulberry has the higher population (230 vs 211 in Oswego). Since 2019, Mulberry's population has grown faster (+9.0% vs -27.7%).
Population, income & housing
| Mulberry | Oswego | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 230 | 211 |
| Median age | 43.6 yrs | 15.4 yrs |
| Median household income | $39,697 | — |
| Housing units | 122 | 40 |
| Homeownership rate | 43.1% | 100.0% |
| Bachelor's degree or higher | 10.9% | 0.0% |
| Unemployment rate | 0.0% | — |
Trends (ACS 5-year, 2019–2023)
| Mulberry | Oswego | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 211 → 230 (+9.0%) | 292 → 211 (-27.7%) |
| Median household income | $25,625 → $39,697 (+54.9%) | $47,625 → $52,708 (+10.7%) |
| Median home value | $62,700 → $66,200 (+5.6%) | $229,600 → $229,700 (+0.0%) |
| Median gross rent | $1,102 → $1,101 (-0.1%) | — |
Mulberry
211230
$25,625$39,697
$62,700$66,200
$1,102$1,101
Oswego
292211
$47,625$52,708
$229,600$229,700
Age & race/ethnicity
Age distribution (share)
| Mulberry | Oswego | |
|---|---|---|
| Under 5 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 5 to 17 | 0.0% | 61.1% |
| 18 to 24 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 25 to 34 | 12.2% | 0.0% |
| 35 to 44 | 47.0% | 0.0% |
| 45 to 54 | 34.8% | 0.0% |
| 55 to 64 | 0.9% | 38.9% |
| 65 to 74 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 75 and over | 5.2% | 0.0% |
Race & ethnicity (share)
| Mulberry | Oswego | |
|---|---|---|
| White (non-Hispanic) | 42.6% | 100.0% |
| Black or African American | 57.4% | 0.0% |
| American Indian & Alaska Native | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Asian | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Native Hawaiian & Pacific Islander | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Some other race | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Two or more races | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Educational attainment (age 25+)
Share of adults 25+
| Mulberry | Oswego | |
|---|---|---|
| No high school diploma | 28.3% | 0.0% |
| High school graduate | 43.5% | 100.0% |
| Some college or associate's | 17.4% | 0.0% |
| Bachelor's degree | 5.7% | 0.0% |
| Graduate or professional degree | 5.2% | 0.0% |
Commute to work
How workers get to work (share)
| Mulberry | Oswego | |
|---|---|---|
| Drove alone | 65.7% | — |
| Carpooled | 32.9% | — |
| Public transit | 1.4% | — |
| Walked | 0.0% | — |
| Bicycle | 0.0% | — |
| Worked from home | 0.0% | — |
| Other means | 0.0% | — |
Housing
Units in structure (share)
| Mulberry | Oswego | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-unit, detached | 49.2% | 0.0% |
| 1-unit, attached | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2 to 4 units | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 5 to 19 units | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 20 or more units | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Mobile home & other | 50.8% | 100.0% |
Poverty & households
| Mulberry | Oswego | |
|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 17.6% | 100.0% |
| Average household size | — | 5.28 |
| Median year structure built | 1970 | — |
Full profiles
2Related rankings
21- Largest by population — cities in South Carolina
- Most densely populated — cities in South Carolina
- Highest median household income — cities in South Carolina
- Highest median home value — cities in South Carolina
- Most affordable home values — cities in South Carolina
- Highest median gross rent — cities in South Carolina
- Cheapest median gross rent — cities in South Carolina
- Oldest by median age — cities in South Carolina
- Youngest by median age — cities in South Carolina
- Most college-educated — cities in South Carolina
- Highest poverty rate — cities in South Carolina
- Lowest poverty rate — cities in South Carolina
- Highest homeownership rate — cities in South Carolina
- Lowest homeownership rate — cities in South Carolina
- Longest commutes — cities in South Carolina
- Shortest commutes — cities in South Carolina
- Largest households — cities in South Carolina
- Newest housing — cities in South Carolina
- Oldest housing — cities in South Carolina
- Fastest-growing (2019–2023) — cities in South Carolina
- Fastest-shrinking (2019–2023) — cities in South Carolina