US Civic Data

Hoot Owl vs Iron Post

A side-by-side comparison of Hoot Owl and Iron Post: population, income, housing, and more.

Hoot Owl and Iron Post are places in Oklahoma. This page compares them across population, income, housing, education, commuting, and how each has changed since 2019.

Iron Post has the higher population (43 vs 0 in Hoot Owl).

Population, income & housing

Hoot OwlIron Post
Population043
Median age—61.6 yrs
Housing units031
Homeownership rate—95.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher—0.0%
Unemployment rate—0.0%

Trends (ACS 5-year, 2019–2023)

Hoot OwlIron Post
Population0 → 0 (+0.0%)191 → 43 (-77.5%)
Median household income—$83,611 → $42,946 (-48.6%)
Median home value—$93,800 → $95,600 (+1.9%)

Hoot Owl

Population
00

Iron Post

Population
19143
Median household income
$83,611$42,946
Median home value
$93,800$95,600

Age & race/ethnicity

Age distribution (share)

Hoot OwlIron Post
Under 5—0.0%
5 to 17—0.0%
18 to 24—0.0%
25 to 34—0.0%
35 to 44—25.6%
45 to 54—0.0%
55 to 64—39.5%
65 to 74—32.6%
75 and over—2.3%

Race & ethnicity (share)

Hoot OwlIron Post
White (non-Hispanic)—95.3%
Black or African American—0.0%
American Indian & Alaska Native—4.7%
Asian—0.0%
Native Hawaiian & Pacific Islander—0.0%
Some other race—0.0%
Two or more races—0.0%
Hispanic or Latino—0.0%

Educational attainment (age 25+)

Share of adults 25+

Hoot OwlIron Post
No high school diploma—0.0%
High school graduate—32.6%
Some college or associate's—67.4%
Bachelor's degree—0.0%
Graduate or professional degree—0.0%

Commute to work

How workers get to work (share)

Hoot OwlIron Post
Drove alone—100.0%
Carpooled—0.0%
Public transit—0.0%
Walked—0.0%
Bicycle—0.0%
Worked from home—0.0%
Other means—0.0%

Housing

Units in structure (share)

Hoot OwlIron Post
1-unit, detached—32.3%
1-unit, attached—0.0%
2 to 4 units—0.0%
5 to 19 units—0.0%
20 or more units—0.0%
Mobile home & other—67.7%

Poverty & households

Hoot OwlIron Post
Poverty rate—0.0%
Average household size—1.87
Median year structure built—2002

Full profiles

2

Related rankings

21