Armstrong vs Utica
A side-by-side comparison of Armstrong and Utica: population, income, housing, and more.
Armstrong and Utica are places in Oklahoma. This page compares them across population, income, housing, education, commuting, and how each has changed since 2019.
Armstrong has the higher population (128 vs 24 in Utica). Since 2019, Armstrong's population has grown faster (+24.3% vs -47.8%).
Population, income & housing
| Armstrong | Utica | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 128 | 24 |
| Median age | 31.6 yrs | 65.8 yrs |
| Median household income | $45,000 | — |
| Median home value | $81,300 | — |
| Median gross rent | $583 | — |
| Housing units | 48 | 22 |
| Homeownership rate | 72.5% | 90.9% |
| Bachelor's degree or higher | 15.5% | 0.0% |
| Unemployment rate | 12.7% | 0.0% |
Trends (ACS 5-year, 2019–2023)
| Armstrong | Utica | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 103 → 128 (+24.3%) | 46 → 24 (-47.8%) |
| Median household income | $49,375 → $45,000 (-8.9%) | — |
| Median home value | $56,100 → $81,300 (+44.9%) | — |
| Median gross rent | $1,063 → $583 (-45.2%) | — |
Armstrong
103128
$49,375$45,000
$56,100$81,300
$1,063$583
Utica
4624
Age & race/ethnicity
Age distribution (share)
| Armstrong | Utica | |
|---|---|---|
| Under 5 | 10.2% | 0.0% |
| 5 to 17 | 26.6% | 0.0% |
| 18 to 24 | 7.8% | 0.0% |
| 25 to 34 | 10.9% | 12.5% |
| 35 to 44 | 14.1% | 0.0% |
| 45 to 54 | 12.5% | 0.0% |
| 55 to 64 | 7.0% | 0.0% |
| 65 to 74 | 3.1% | 87.5% |
| 75 and over | 7.8% | 0.0% |
Race & ethnicity (share)
| Armstrong | Utica | |
|---|---|---|
| White (non-Hispanic) | 46.1% | 100.0% |
| Black or African American | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| American Indian & Alaska Native | 13.3% | 0.0% |
| Asian | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Native Hawaiian & Pacific Islander | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Some other race | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Two or more races | 24.2% | 0.0% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 16.4% | 0.0% |
Educational attainment (age 25+)
Share of adults 25+
| Armstrong | Utica | |
|---|---|---|
| No high school diploma | 16.9% | 4.2% |
| High school graduate | 46.5% | 8.3% |
| Some college or associate's | 21.1% | 87.5% |
| Bachelor's degree | 7.0% | 0.0% |
| Graduate or professional degree | 8.5% | 0.0% |
Commute to work
How workers get to work (share)
| Armstrong | Utica | |
|---|---|---|
| Drove alone | 84.6% | 83.3% |
| Carpooled | 5.8% | 16.7% |
| Public transit | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Walked | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Bicycle | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Worked from home | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Other means | 9.6% | 0.0% |
Housing
Units in structure (share)
| Armstrong | Utica | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-unit, detached | 79.2% | 50.0% |
| 1-unit, attached | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2 to 4 units | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 5 to 19 units | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 20 or more units | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Mobile home & other | 20.8% | 50.0% |
Poverty & households
| Armstrong | Utica | |
|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 13.3% | 0.0% |
| Average household size | 3.20 | 2.18 |
| Mean commute (minutes) | 20 | 20 |
| Median year structure built | 1963 | 1985 |
Full profiles
2Related rankings
21- Largest by population — cities in Oklahoma
- Most densely populated — cities in Oklahoma
- Highest median household income — cities in Oklahoma
- Highest median home value — cities in Oklahoma
- Most affordable home values — cities in Oklahoma
- Highest median gross rent — cities in Oklahoma
- Cheapest median gross rent — cities in Oklahoma
- Oldest by median age — cities in Oklahoma
- Youngest by median age — cities in Oklahoma
- Most college-educated — cities in Oklahoma
- Highest poverty rate — cities in Oklahoma
- Lowest poverty rate — cities in Oklahoma
- Highest homeownership rate — cities in Oklahoma
- Lowest homeownership rate — cities in Oklahoma
- Longest commutes — cities in Oklahoma
- Shortest commutes — cities in Oklahoma
- Largest households — cities in Oklahoma
- Newest housing — cities in Oklahoma
- Oldest housing — cities in Oklahoma
- Fastest-growing (2019–2023) — cities in Oklahoma
- Fastest-shrinking (2019–2023) — cities in Oklahoma