Angel Fire vs Ute Park
A side-by-side comparison of Angel Fire and Ute Park: population, income, housing, and more.
Angel Fire and Ute Park are places in New Mexico. This page compares them across population, income, housing, education, commuting, and how each has changed since 2019.
Angel Fire has the higher population (1,089 vs 0 in Ute Park). Since 2019, Angel Fire's population has grown faster (+40.9% vs -100.0%).
Population, income & housing
| Angel Fire | Ute Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,089 | 0 |
| Median age | 57.3 yrs | — |
| Median household income | $79,821 | — |
| Median home value | $476,200 | — |
| Median gross rent | $1,120 | — |
| Housing units | 2,507 | 118 |
| Homeownership rate | 82.6% | — |
| Bachelor's degree or higher | 44.5% | — |
| Unemployment rate | 1.7% | — |
Trends (ACS 5-year, 2019–2023)
| Angel Fire | Ute Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 773 → 1,089 (+40.9%) | 205 → 0 (-100.0%) |
| Median household income | $59,063 → $79,821 (+35.1%) | — |
| Median home value | $324,600 → $476,200 (+46.7%) | — |
| Median gross rent | $629 → $1,120 (+78.1%) | — |
Angel Fire
7731,089
$59,063$79,821
$324,600$476,200
$629$1,120
Ute Park
2050
Age & race/ethnicity
Age distribution (share)
| Angel Fire | Ute Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Under 5 | 1.0% | — |
| 5 to 17 | 15.9% | — |
| 18 to 24 | 10.7% | — |
| 25 to 34 | 3.3% | — |
| 35 to 44 | 5.4% | — |
| 45 to 54 | 7.5% | — |
| 55 to 64 | 24.3% | — |
| 65 to 74 | 21.1% | — |
| 75 and over | 10.7% | — |
Race & ethnicity (share)
| Angel Fire | Ute Park | |
|---|---|---|
| White (non-Hispanic) | 68.0% | — |
| Black or African American | 1.3% | — |
| American Indian & Alaska Native | 0.9% | — |
| Asian | 0.2% | — |
| Native Hawaiian & Pacific Islander | 0.0% | — |
| Some other race | 0.0% | — |
| Two or more races | 8.6% | — |
| Hispanic or Latino | 21.0% | — |
Educational attainment (age 25+)
Share of adults 25+
| Angel Fire | Ute Park | |
|---|---|---|
| No high school diploma | 2.5% | — |
| High school graduate | 15.6% | — |
| Some college or associate's | 37.3% | — |
| Bachelor's degree | 20.3% | — |
| Graduate or professional degree | 24.2% | — |
Commute to work
How workers get to work (share)
| Angel Fire | Ute Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Drove alone | 44.7% | — |
| Carpooled | 3.7% | — |
| Public transit | 0.0% | — |
| Walked | 0.0% | — |
| Bicycle | 0.0% | — |
| Worked from home | 37.6% | — |
| Other means | 13.9% | — |
Housing
Units in structure (share)
| Angel Fire | Ute Park | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-unit, detached | 70.8% | 60.2% |
| 1-unit, attached | 1.4% | 0.0% |
| 2 to 4 units | 6.3% | 0.0% |
| 5 to 19 units | 14.8% | 0.0% |
| 20 or more units | 4.1% | 0.0% |
| Mobile home & other | 2.7% | 39.8% |
Poverty & households
| Angel Fire | Ute Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 21.0% | — |
| Average household size | 2.29 | — |
| Mean commute (minutes) | 21 | — |
| Median year structure built | 1988 | 2002 |
Full profiles
2Related rankings
21- Largest by population — cities in New Mexico
- Most densely populated — cities in New Mexico
- Highest median household income — cities in New Mexico
- Highest median home value — cities in New Mexico
- Most affordable home values — cities in New Mexico
- Highest median gross rent — cities in New Mexico
- Cheapest median gross rent — cities in New Mexico
- Oldest by median age — cities in New Mexico
- Youngest by median age — cities in New Mexico
- Most college-educated — cities in New Mexico
- Highest poverty rate — cities in New Mexico
- Lowest poverty rate — cities in New Mexico
- Highest homeownership rate — cities in New Mexico
- Lowest homeownership rate — cities in New Mexico
- Longest commutes — cities in New Mexico
- Shortest commutes — cities in New Mexico
- Largest households — cities in New Mexico
- Newest housing — cities in New Mexico
- Oldest housing — cities in New Mexico
- Fastest-growing (2019–2023) — cities in New Mexico
- Fastest-shrinking (2019–2023) — cities in New Mexico