Nitta Yuma vs Rolling Fork
A side-by-side comparison of Nitta Yuma and Rolling Fork: population, income, housing, and more.
Nitta Yuma and Rolling Fork are places in Mississippi. This page compares them across population, income, housing, education, commuting, and how each has changed since 2019.
Rolling Fork has the higher population (2,001 vs 0 in Nitta Yuma).
Population, income & housing
| Nitta Yuma | Rolling Fork | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 0 | 2,001 |
| Median age | — | 35.9 yrs |
| Median household income | — | $34,375 |
| Median home value | — | $121,100 |
| Median gross rent | — | $592 |
| Housing units | 0 | 900 |
| Homeownership rate | — | 59.9% |
| Bachelor's degree or higher | — | 9.2% |
| Unemployment rate | — | 6.6% |
Trends (ACS 5-year, 2019–2023)
| Nitta Yuma | Rolling Fork | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 0 → 0 (+0.0%) | 2,103 → 2,001 (-4.9%) |
| Median household income | — | $26,996 → $34,375 (+27.3%) |
| Median home value | — | $69,100 → $121,100 (+75.3%) |
| Median gross rent | — | $478 → $592 (+23.8%) |
Nitta Yuma
00
Rolling Fork
2,1032,001
$26,996$34,375
$69,100$121,100
$478$592
Age & race/ethnicity
Age distribution (share)
| Nitta Yuma | Rolling Fork | |
|---|---|---|
| Under 5 | — | 6.3% |
| 5 to 17 | — | 19.5% |
| 18 to 24 | — | 8.4% |
| 25 to 34 | — | 11.7% |
| 35 to 44 | — | 12.5% |
| 45 to 54 | — | 6.1% |
| 55 to 64 | — | 14.2% |
| 65 to 74 | — | 13.9% |
| 75 and over | — | 7.2% |
Race & ethnicity (share)
| Nitta Yuma | Rolling Fork | |
|---|---|---|
| White (non-Hispanic) | — | 21.2% |
| Black or African American | — | 78.8% |
| American Indian & Alaska Native | — | 0.0% |
| Asian | — | 0.0% |
| Native Hawaiian & Pacific Islander | — | 0.0% |
| Some other race | — | 0.0% |
| Two or more races | — | 0.0% |
| Hispanic or Latino | — | 0.0% |
Educational attainment (age 25+)
Share of adults 25+
| Nitta Yuma | Rolling Fork | |
|---|---|---|
| No high school diploma | — | 15.4% |
| High school graduate | — | 51.3% |
| Some college or associate's | — | 24.2% |
| Bachelor's degree | — | 6.2% |
| Graduate or professional degree | — | 3.0% |
Commute to work
How workers get to work (share)
| Nitta Yuma | Rolling Fork | |
|---|---|---|
| Drove alone | — | 68.4% |
| Carpooled | — | 20.6% |
| Public transit | — | 0.0% |
| Walked | — | 1.2% |
| Bicycle | — | 4.0% |
| Worked from home | — | 0.6% |
| Other means | — | 5.2% |
Housing
Units in structure (share)
| Nitta Yuma | Rolling Fork | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-unit, detached | — | 70.7% |
| 1-unit, attached | — | 2.4% |
| 2 to 4 units | — | 8.3% |
| 5 to 19 units | — | 6.7% |
| 20 or more units | — | 0.0% |
| Mobile home & other | — | 11.9% |
Poverty & households
| Nitta Yuma | Rolling Fork | |
|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | — | 26.3% |
| Average household size | — | 2.67 |
| Mean commute (minutes) | — | 20 |
| Median year structure built | — | 1977 |
Full profiles
2Related rankings
21- Largest by population — cities in Mississippi
- Most densely populated — cities in Mississippi
- Highest median household income — cities in Mississippi
- Highest median home value — cities in Mississippi
- Most affordable home values — cities in Mississippi
- Highest median gross rent — cities in Mississippi
- Cheapest median gross rent — cities in Mississippi
- Oldest by median age — cities in Mississippi
- Youngest by median age — cities in Mississippi
- Most college-educated — cities in Mississippi
- Highest poverty rate — cities in Mississippi
- Lowest poverty rate — cities in Mississippi
- Highest homeownership rate — cities in Mississippi
- Lowest homeownership rate — cities in Mississippi
- Longest commutes — cities in Mississippi
- Shortest commutes — cities in Mississippi
- Largest households — cities in Mississippi
- Newest housing — cities in Mississippi
- Oldest housing — cities in Mississippi
- Fastest-growing (2019–2023) — cities in Mississippi
- Fastest-shrinking (2019–2023) — cities in Mississippi